This paper examines the first decision on reparations issued by the International Criminal Court in the case of Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo. It first addresses a series of elements that contextualize the sentence: the difficulties to redress serious human rights violations, the question of “the return of the victim” in criminal procedure, and the specific background of the case being analyzed. Secondly, this paper focuses on the fourteen principles on reparations formulated in the judgment, and it examines the positive and negative impact of these standards. To do so, it draws on the development of international criminal law and international human rights law.
Keywords:
International Criminal Court, victims, reparations, international justice
Author Biography
Francisco Jara Bustos, Universidad de Chile
Egresado de Derecho, Universidad de Chile. Ayudante ad honorem de las cátedras de Criminología, Derecho Procesal, Derecho del Trabajo y del Centro de Derechos Humanos de la Universidad de Chile durante 2011. Semifinalista en la Moot Court de la Corte Penal Internacional en 2011, y asesor asistente del equipo finalista en 2012.
Jara Bustos, F. (2013). Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo: The International Criminal Court’s First Decision on Reparations. Anuario De Derechos Humanos, (9), pág. 113–125. https://doi.org/10.5354/adh.v0i9.27037